Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.8 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Sony |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 4.00 x 1.75 x 0.68 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 2.80 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 96 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.16 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Sony Ericsson K200 is a lot better than the Nokia 8290, having a general score of 31.7 against 23.8. Sony Ericsson K200's construction is a little thinner but a little bit heavier than Nokia 8290. The Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a much better looking screen than Nokia 8290. Nokia 8290 and Sony Ericsson K200 both feature similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
The Sony Ericsson K200 takes way better pictures and videos than Nokia 8290. The Sony Ericsson K200 features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8290. Sony Ericsson K200 counts with greater battery performance than Nokia 8290, because it has 900mAh of battery capacity instead of 750mAh.
The Sony Ericsson K200 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 8290, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.