Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.7 | 39.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.3 |
| 2007-11-13 | 2009-02-16 |
| 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches | 4.33 x 1.77 x 0.55 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 3.88 ounces |
| $ 1945.00 | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 2.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| OLED | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.75 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 46,08 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 5.94 |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.4 | 1.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 6720 classic is slightly better than Nokia 8800 Arte, having a overall score of 39.1 against 35.7. The Nokia 6720 classic body is newer, just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia 8800 Arte. The Nokia 8800 Arte has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 6720 classic, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 320 x 240px resolution, the Nokia 8800 Arte also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
Nokia 8800 Arte has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 6720 classic, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 1 GB internal memory. Nokia 6720 classic counts with a superior processing unit than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a larger number of cores.
Nokia 6720 classic captures slightly better photographs and videos than Nokia 8800 Arte, and although they both have the same 640x480 video quality and the same 15 frames per second video frame rate, the Nokia 6720 classic also has a camera with a much better 5 megapixels resolution. The Nokia 6720 classic has a little better battery lifetime than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a 1050mAh battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 6720 classic is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.