Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2007-11-13 | 2019-09-27 |
| 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 1945.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 12 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.4 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Nokia 8800 Arte, getting a score of 97.6 against 35.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is notably heavier than the Nokia 8800 Arte, it's way thinner and extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater performance than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Fold features a much sharper display than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a much better display pixel density, a lot higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a much bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots greater pictures and videos than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a really longer battery duration than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 1000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a little more money than the Nokia 8800 Arte, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.