Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2007-11-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1945.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| -- | 12 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.4 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Nokia 8800 Arte's 35.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a notably newer and much thinner phone than Nokia 8800 Arte, although it is incredibly heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better looking screen than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a way bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better performing processing unit than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes way better videos and photos than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior battery performance than Nokia 8800 Arte, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 1000mAh.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.