Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.733.2
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
2008-08-192006-09-04
4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches4.21 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches
5.29 ounces4.90 ounces
$ 2100.00$ 2200.00
Display / Screen
2 inches--
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)208 x 208 pixels
OLEDTFT
200 pixels per inch163 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.66
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4 GB internal memory131,07 MB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
2.50.6
Camera
3.20 MP2.00 MP
640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution--
5.614.73
UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.3
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery700mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
2.8 hours talk time
2.562.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.0
Accelerometer--
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is better than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, having a 36.7 score against 33.2. Although Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is a little bit heavier than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, it's thinner and also newer. The Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition and Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte count with similar processors, both have a 0-Core processing unit.

The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte features a much better screen than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240 and a bit greater pixel number per inch of screen. The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has 4 GB internal memory.

Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte has a much longer battery life than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has a 43% more battery size. The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte takes better photos and videos than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has a camera with much more MP.

The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.