Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 36.7 | 40 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2008-08-19 | 2008-09-29 |
| 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches | 4.25 x 2.15 x 0.54 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 4.27 ounces |
| $ 2100.00 | $ 470.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 146 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 6.6 | 5.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 204,8 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 0.8 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 8.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 5.61 | 6.38 |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 290 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Samsung Pixon has an overall score of 40, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte's general score of 36.7. Even though the Samsung Pixon and Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte were only released 1 months apart, the Samsung Pixon is lighter and just a little thinner. The Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte has a much better screen than Samsung Pixon, because although it has a bit worse 320 x 240px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Pixon has a processing unit that is just as good as the CPU in Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte, they have a 0-Core CPU. Samsung Pixon captures much better photographs and videos than Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte, and although they both have the same 720x480 video resolution, the Samsung Pixon also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Pixon, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 4 GB internal memory. The Samsung Pixon features a battery life that's just as good as the Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte one.
Samsung Pixon is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.