Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.740.3
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
--2009-02-16
4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches
5.29 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 1715.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
OLEDTFT
200 pixels per inch179 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.66.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
4 GB internal memory92,16 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
2.50.6
Camera
3.20 MP5.00 MP
640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution
5.616.05
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery880mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.562.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer

Comparison review

Samsung Ultra S has a general score of 40.3, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8800 Gold Arte's overall score of 36.7. Samsung Ultra S is a thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Nokia 8800 Gold Arte. Nokia 8800 Gold Arte and Samsung Ultra S have quite similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor.

The Nokia 8800 Gold Arte features a bit sharper display than Samsung Ultra S, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit lower 320 x 240 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of screen. The Nokia 8800 Gold Arte features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Ultra S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 4 GB internal storage capacity.

The Samsung Ultra S captures clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 8800 Gold Arte, and although they both have the same 720x480 video definition, the Samsung Ultra S also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with much more MP. Nokia 8800 Gold Arte counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Ultra S, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Ultra S is also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.