Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.235.3
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
2006-09-042008-10-21
4.21 x 1.77 x 0.64 inches3.81 x 1.87 x 0.73 inches
4.90 ounces4.97 ounces
$ 2200.00$ 2269.00
Display / Screen
--1.6 inches
208 x 208 pixels --
TFTLCD
163 pixels per inch115 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
65.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
131,07 MB internal memory2 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.61.9
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery810mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
2.8 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
7.3 hours talk time
2.082.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Motorola AURA has a global score of 35.3, which is slightly better than the Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition's 33.2 general score. The Motorola AURA construction is way newer than the Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition's, although it is a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition features a bit better looking screen than Motorola AURA, because it has a greater pixel density.

Motorola AURA's processing unit is just as good as Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition's CPU, they have a 0-Core CPU. Motorola AURA and Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition have extremely similar cameras, both of them have the same resolution back facing camera. The Motorola AURA counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has 2 GB internal memory capacity.

Motorola AURA has a bit better battery life than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, because it has a 16% bigger battery size.

Motorola AURA is a little more expensive than Nokia 8800 Sirocco Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.