Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 14.74 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is slightly better than Nokia 9.3 PureView, with an 87.1 score against 84.2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Nokia 9.3 PureView has Android 11, so it provides the user some additional features.
Nokia 9.3 PureView features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better screen than Nokia 9.3 PureView, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller sensor shooting lower quality pictures, it also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has more internal memory.
Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.