Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9.3 PureView's general score of 84.2. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS. Nokia 9.3 PureView has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a higher screen density and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Nokia 9.3 PureView takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.