Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9.3 PureView is slightly better than the Galaxy A50, getting a score of 84.2 against 83.8. The Nokia 9.3 PureView body is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy A50. The Nokia 9.3 PureView features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 9.3 PureView features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bigger display and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nokia 9.3 PureView features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Nokia 9.3 PureView features greater battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.