Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is better than the Nokia 9.3 PureView's 84.2 global score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Nokia 9.3 PureView has Android 11. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better display than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little bit greater screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Nokia 9.3 PureView shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have a 0.75 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same resolution camera, the same aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has higher 120 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.