Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the Nokia 9.3 PureView, with an 86.3 score against 84.2. Galaxy S10e's processing unit is just as good as Nokia 9.3 PureView's processor, they have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM. The Nokia 9.3 PureView features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a bit better pixel density, a bigger display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with a much better resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy S10e has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.