Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than Nokia 9.3 PureView, getting an 88.5 score against 84.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Nokia 9.3 PureView has Android 11 version, giving a couple additional features. The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size display, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better processing power than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 9.3 PureView has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Nokia 9.3 PureView also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.