Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than the Nokia 9.3 PureView, with a global score of 90.6 against 84.2. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should offer the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Nokia 9.3 PureView, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
Nokia 9.3 PureView counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh. The Nokia 9.3 PureView shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.