Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| 2019-03-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with an 84.2 score against 76.4. The iPhone XS construction is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than Nokia 9 PureView, and both were released only 5 months apart. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a little bit worse pixels density, a little bit lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little smaller screen.
IPhone XS counts with just a little better hardware performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has lesser RAM and 2 lesser and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Nokia 9 PureView has better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 3320mAh battery size against 2659mAh. The iPhone XS captures slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera, the iPhone XS also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
IPhone XS costs a lot more money than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.