Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2019-03-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. The Google Pixel construction is lighter than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's just a bit thicker and was released 2 years before. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a just a bit greater screen pixel density and a bigger display.
Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel features a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel also counts with a back-facing camera with more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Google Pixel's storage for applications and games is just as good as the Nokia 9 PureView one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Nokia 9 PureView has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3320mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.