Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a global score of 81.9 against 76.4. Even though Google Pixel 4 and the Nokia 9 PureView were released with only a few months difference, Google Pixel 4's construction is a little bit lighter but a little thicker than the Nokia 9 PureView.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little larger display and a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 9 PureView and the Google Pixel 4 both have extremely similar processors, they have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Nokia 9 PureView has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3320mAh battery size. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4 also has a back facing camera with a higher resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.