Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer and somewhat lighter than Nokia 9 PureView's, although it's also a little thicker. Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4a. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a little larger display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a features a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
The Nokia 9 PureView and the Google Pixel 4a both count with incredibly similar storage for games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory. Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.