Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. The HTC One M9 is a way older and thicker phone than the Nokia 9 PureView, but HTC made it a little lighter anyway. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better CPU than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit processor.
HTC One M9 counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller screen. Nokia 9 PureView has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
The HTC One M9 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the HTC One M9 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels and a larger sensor.
Nokia 9 PureView features superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.