Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-03 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView has a score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the LG G5's 76.1 score. Nokia 9 PureView's design is much newer than LG G5's, but it is just a bit thicker and a little heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster CPU than LG G5, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid screen than LG G5, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a bit bigger display. The LG G5 features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia 9 PureView features greater battery performance than LG G5, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity. The LG G5 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG G5 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G5, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G5. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get LG G5, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.