Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-03 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. LG V30S ThinQ's body is just a bit lighter and a little thinner than Nokia 9 PureView, even though it was released about 12 months before. Nokia 9 PureView features a bit superior processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have the same exact 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a same size screen. The LG V30S ThinQ shoots slightly better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView and LG V30S ThinQ feature very similar batteries, although the LG V30S ThinQ has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ costs more than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.