Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting an 87.1 score against 76.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer device than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a lot lower pixel amount per inch of screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with greater battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.