Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, having a general score of 76.4 against 76.1. The Nokia 9 PureView design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released only 14 months before. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Moto G Power counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Nokia 9 PureView features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto G Power shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size back camera sensor and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Power also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 16 MP resolution camera.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.