Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-03 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, having a 76.4 score against 75.8. The Nokia 9 PureView is a noticeably newer device than Moto Z Force, but it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker. Nokia 9 PureView has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a just a bit better pixel density.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5% bigger battery size. Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with a much higher 21 megapixels resolution.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.