Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2019-03-03 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a overall score of 77.4 against 76.4. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older device than Nokia 9 PureView, but Motorola made it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a quite larger display, a just a little better screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a larger camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
The Nokia 9 PureView features superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a bit more than the Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 9 PureView. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Nokia 9 PureView, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.