Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2019-03-03 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a 77.4 score against 76.4. The Moto Z2 Play body is much thinner and lighter than Nokia 9 PureView, even though it was released around a year before. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better screen density, a little bit larger display and a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have a same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.