Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-03 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The Motorola Moto Z3 is a thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the Nokia 9 PureView, even when both of them were only released 7 months apart. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little sharper display than Moto Z3, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 3320mAh battery size.
Moto Z3 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.