Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, getting a overall score of 78.5 against 76.4. The Motorola One Action is a thicker and a little heavier device than Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Motorola One Action has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Action has a little longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. The Nokia 9 PureView captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Action. Both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola One Action is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.