Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a 79.8 score against 76.4. Even though Motorola One Hyper is newer than Nokia 9 PureView, it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has a superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has longer battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.