Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier phone than Nokia 9 PureView, but they are equally thin. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a much better display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of display. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light images.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Nokia 9 PureView features longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3320mAh battery size.
Motorola razr (2020) costs a lot more money than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.