Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView has an overall score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Nokia 9 PureView design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a lot higher video quality, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 3S, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.