Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-03 | -- |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Nokia 9 PureView's overall score of 76.4. Galaxy A34's body is lighter and a lot thinner than the Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixel number in each screen inch. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a much longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3320mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A34 also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.