Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a much better resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Nokia 9 PureView, both have the same internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.