Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G features greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3320mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.