Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is notably newer than the Nokia 9 PureView's, but it's just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixel quantity per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with superior battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.