Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| 2019-03-03 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a global score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A6's general score of 75.8. Nokia 9 PureView is a newer phone than Galaxy A6, although it's just a bit thicker and a little heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView features a much better screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit larger display, a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a much less megapixels camera and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size, the Nokia 9 PureView also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. The Nokia 9 PureView has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.