Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is slightly better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy A70 is a a little heavier phone than Nokia 9 PureView, but both are equally thin. The Nokia 9 PureView has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display pixels density. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3320mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A70 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.