Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-03 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, having a 78.9 score against 76.4. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView features a slightly better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little faster processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy M20 has a very superior battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3320mAh. Nokia 9 PureView captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures, a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.