Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting an 87.7 score against 76.4. The Galaxy M51 design is newer than Nokia 9 PureView's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M51. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures much clearer videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 111% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.