Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than the Nokia 9 PureView, it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.