Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Nokia 9 PureView, having a score of 98 against 76.4. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is newer, but much heavier and thicker than the Nokia 9 PureView. The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count per display inch.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better processing power than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way larger back camera sensor, a much more MP camera and a way higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.