Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-03 | -- |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a overall score of 82.6 against 76.4. Galaxy S25's construction is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than the Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a much lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The Galaxy S25 and Nokia 9 PureView have very similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 takes much clearer videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher video definition, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3320mAh.
The Galaxy S25 costs a bit more than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.