Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-03 | -- |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Nokia 9 PureView. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a brighter display than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Nokia 9 PureView has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 51% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture, a way higher video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.