Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 537 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView's general score of 76.4. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Nokia 9 PureView, although it is way thicker and notably heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory for apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Nokia 9 PureView takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a smaller camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the Nokia 9 PureView also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 9 PureView. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia 9 PureView, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.