Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. Although Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit heavier than Nokia 9 PureView, it's just a little thinner and newer. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixels number per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP, the Galaxy Z Flip also has higher video frame rates and a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip features a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in Nokia 9 PureView, although the Galaxy Z Flip has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.