Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is notably newer and thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView and Galaxy Z Flip 3 both have quite similar processors, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Nokia 9 PureView shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3. They have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3's memory for apps and games is very similar to Nokia 9 PureView's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 3's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in Nokia 9 PureView, although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just 3300mAh of battery size.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is way more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.