Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a 92.3 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is just a little bit heavier than Nokia 9 PureView, it's a little thinner and newer. Nokia 9 PureView has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery performance is very similar to Nokia 9 PureView's battery performance, although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a 1% smaller battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a camera with a 12 megapixels, the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.