Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's a lot heavier. Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better processing power than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and faster video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with better battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.