Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.2 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Symbian 7.0s | -- |
| 2004-09-08 | 2008-01-07 |
| 5.19 x 2.00 x 0.82 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 640 x 200 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 81,92 MB internal memory | -- |
| MMC external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 0 |
| EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 970mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 is just a bit better than Nokia 9300, getting a score of 25.6 against 24.2. Motorola W270 is a much newer device, and it's also lighter and much thinner than the Nokia 9300. The Motorola W270 and Nokia 9300 feature incredibly similar processors, both have 0 processing cores. Motorola W270 features a screen that's very similar to the screen in Nokia 9300, although the Motorola W270 has a way lower 128 x 128 pixels resolution.
Nokia 9300 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola W270, although it has no external SD slot. The Motorola W270's camera is just as good as Nokia 9300's camera. Nokia 9300 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola W270, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola W270 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.